The extent of vehicular injury following an accident shouldn’t be, in itself, a definitive indicator of authorized fault. Whereas seemingly intuitive, assigning accountability solely primarily based on the quantity of seen destruction neglects the complexities of collision dynamics and relevant visitors legal guidelines. For example, a car struck in its aspect by a faster-moving automobile might maintain important injury regardless of the opposite driver being primarily at fault attributable to failure to yield.
Reliance on seen injury as the only real determinant of fault would create a system inclined to misinterpretation and doubtlessly unjust outcomes. Components corresponding to car dimension, building supplies, and angle of impression all affect the extent of bodily hurt. A smaller automobile might take in extra injury from a low-speed impression than a bigger, extra sturdy car concerned in the identical incident, with out essentially indicating culpability. Historic authorized precedent persistently emphasizes the significance of figuring out negligence or violation of visitors legal guidelines, fairly than solely specializing in the bodily aftermath.
